Salem Witch Trials Essay Ideas For Fahrenheit

Passage Summary: Kurt Vonnegut (1922-2007) was an American author and humorist. One month after an English teacher at Drake High School in North Dakota decided to teach Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Slaughterhouse-Five in his classroom, Charles McCarthy, the head of the school board, decided that the novel’s “obscene language” was not appropriate. Every copy of Slaughterhouse-Five at Drake High School was burned in the school’s furnace. In response, Vonnegut wrote this letter to McCarthy.

When and How to Pair: Have students read this essay before starting the novel. Ask students to discuss whether they believe there are particular books that should be banned from schools. What does the type of books that are banned from schools say about the society we live in? As students read Fahrenheit 451, have them keep track of what books and authors are referenced. Why would the author choose to mention those books and authors?

"The Witch" by Joseph E. Baker is in the public domain.

“I saw Sarah Good with the Devil!

I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil!

I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil!”

The speaker is Reverent Hale, a serious student of witchcraft, in the closing scene of Act I of Arthur Miller’s classic play The Crucible. Hale is repeating the frenzied accusations he had just heard in Salem, a village in the colony of Massachusetts, from three young girls who said they were possessed by the devil. It is not clear whether or not he yet believes what he was told.

But in short order, many in the village did. The charges by the clearly unhinged youngsters spread like wildfire and in the spring of 1692 launched a terrifying wave of hysteria. The Salem witch trials that followed are the subject of Miller’s play. A harrowing example of iniquity and staggering unreason, the tragic proceedings have become a synonym for justice gone mad. In less than a year, they embroiled[1] 200 individuals, 20 of whom were executed.Q1

The trials, based on British laws, were swift. Anyone who suspected that some untoward[2] event or development was the work of a witch, could bring the charge to a local magistrate.[3] The magistrate would have the alleged evil-doer arrested and brought in for public interrogation, where the suspect was urged to confess. Whatever his or her response, if the charge of witchcraft was deemed to be credible, the accused was turned over to a superior court and brought before a grand jury.

Much of the evidence used in the “trial” was the testimony of the accuser. If more “evidence” was needed, the grand jury might consider the so-called “witch cake”, a bizarre concoction that was made from rye meal and urine of the witch’s victim and fed to a dog. Eating the cake was supposed to hurt the witch, whose cry of pain would betray her secret identity.

History records that one suspect was subjected to peine forte et dure,[4] a form of torture in which he was pressed beneath an increasingly heavy load of stones to make him enter a plea. He died without confessing. Some of those convicted of “witchcraft” were paraded through the streets of the town on their way to the execution. The sentencing of Bridget Bishop, the first victim of the witch trials, was typical of the Salem justice.Q2

Bishop was accused of not living “a Puritan lifestyle” because she wore black clothing and costumes that were against the group’s code. Also, her coat had been found to be oddly “cut or torn in two ways”, and her behavior was regarded as “immoral.” Thus convicted of witchcraft, she was tried on June 10, 1692, and executed by hanging the same day.

Immediately following this execution, the court adjourned for 20 days and asked for advice from New England’s most influential ministers “upon the state of things as they then stood.” Mere five days later, they produced a voluble[5] answer penned by Cotton Mather, the prolific pamphleteer[6] of the period, assuring the court and the grand jury that they had done well.

The prominent ministers “humbly recommend[ed]” more of the same, that is, “the speedy and vigorous prosecution of such as have rendered themselves obnoxious, according to the direction given in the laws of God, and the wholesome statutes of the English nation....”

More people were accused, arrested and examined, but historians believe that by September 1692, the hysteria had begun to abate and public opinion turned against the trials. In 1693, some of the convicted suspects were pardoned by the governor; the Massachusetts General Court annulled[7] the guilty verdicts, and even granted indemnities[8] to their victims’ families.Q3

Other Historic “Witch” Hunts

The Salem episode was a historic landmark, but by no means a rare example of inhumane and insane behavior that can afflict frightened, angry or frustrated people if they’re urged by demagogues[9] to confront an alleged “menace.”

One hundred years after the Salem trials, courts in France launched mass executions of suspected enemies of the revolution that deposed[10] the monarchy. The “Reign of Terror,” conducted without trials and made more efficient by the use of a new labor-saving machine – the guillotine[11] – lasted from 6 September 1793 until 28 July 1794. It beheaded a total of 42,000 individuals.

Humanity’s most heinous crime, the Holocaust, was carried out from 1933 till 1945 by 200,000 fanatics acting on orders of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime, but it was also abetted by crass bigotry and sense superiority then affecting many Germans.

The toll included an estimated six million Jews – one-fourth of them children – and five million other people the Nazis regarded as “minderwertig” – “inferior.” They were primarily ethnic Poles, captured Soviet civilians and prisoners of war, other Slavs, Romanis, communists, homosexuals, Jehovah’s Witnesses and the mentally and physically disabled. The mass murder was carried out by gas or shooting in six large camps and many smaller extermination facilities in Germany and German-occupied territories.Q4

The Great Purge or the Great Terror in the former USSR – Union of Soviet Socialist Republics – was carried out from 1936 to 1938 on orders of the Communist Party chairman and Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. The main victims of the Moscow show trials were Communist officials and upper echelons[12] of the country’s Red Army, some of whom confessed to crimes they had not committed. The purge terrorized the entire Soviet civil service and other leading members of the society – intellectuals, writers, academicians, artists, and scientists. 

According to declassified Soviet archives, during 1937 and 1938, the state police detained 1,548,366 persons, of whom 681,692 were shot – an average of 1,000 executions a day. Students of the period believe that the actual executions were two to three times higher.Q5

Public Scares in the U.S.

In the United States, groundless fears,[13] prejudices and demagoguery produced three notable events that echo the Salem trials. All three happened under pressures created by the direst emergencies ever experienced by our nation, which were the Second World War, and by the Cold War in its aftermath.

The first episode started three months after the December 7, 1941 Japanese devastating attack on Pearl Harbor, when President Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued an order that allowed regional military commanders to designate “military areas” from which “any or all persons may be excluded.”

The order reflected the widespread fear that presumably poorly assimilated[14] Japanese immigrants and their offspring would be more loyal to their ancient homeland than to their new country. To prevent the rise of such an “enemy within” during the war, state and local authorities along the West Coast removed from their homes over 110,000 Japanese Americans, almost two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens, and transferred them to hundreds of internment camps.[15]

Far from being disloyal, hundreds of the young internees volunteered for the U.S. Army and fought with distinction in a nearly all-Japanese regiment in Europe. After the war, the camps were closed and the residents were allowed to return to their homes. Subsequent investigation by a special government commission found little evidence of Japanese disloyalty and concluded the wartime scare had been the product of racism.Q6

The second and third disgraceful episodes were triggered by irrational fear of communist subversion before and after the onset of the Cold War, an era in which the Soviet leaders proclaimed the superiority of Marxist doctrines and threatened the “bury” the liberal democracies of the United States and other Western nations.

In the late 1930’s, following two major film industry strikes, Hollywood movie producers and members of the U.S. Congress accused the Screen Writer’s Guild of including Communist party members. Although the party was legal and its membership was not a crime, in the 1940’s and 1950’s the charges led to widespread blacklisting[16] of screenwriters, actors, and other entertainment professionals. The so-called “First Red Scare” seriously damaged or ruined the careers of hundreds of individuals working in the film industry.

Its highlight came in 1947 when ten of these film writers and directors were brought before the House Un-American Activities Committee[17] and questioned whether they were, or had been, Communist party members. When they refused to answer, they were cited for contempt[18] of Congress, fired from their jobs and in 1950 began serving a one-year jail sentence.Q7

The start of the “Second Red Scare” is usually traced to a speech that Joseph McCarthy, a U.S. Senator from Wisconsin, delivered on February 9, 1950, to the Republican Women’s Club of Wheeling, West Virginia. Already prominent as a rabid anti-communist, he waved a sheet of paper and announced, “I have here in my hand a list of 205” members of the Communist party who, he said, “are still working and shaping policy in the State Department.”

McCarthy never released the alleged list of names or proved any of his charges, but his reckless and vicious accusations made him both feared and famous.

During his brief political career, he made undocumented charges of communism, communist sympathies, disloyalty, or homosexuality against hundreds of politicians and other individuals inside and outside of government, including the administration of President Harry S. Truman, the Voice of America, and the United States Army.

Government employees and workers in private industry whose characters or loyalty were smeared by McCarthy’s broad brush lost their jobs. His crusade of slander ended four years after it started when his charges were rejected during televised McCarthy-Army hearings in 1954, and he was publicly denounced by fellow Republicans and Edward R. Morrow, a leading TV journalist. Q8

The Senator’s only legacy is an addition to our lexicon:[19] “McCarthyism” is a term that stands for demagogic, scurrilous,[20] and reckless character assassination of opponents.

All three U.S. public scares had a significant aftermath:

In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed a commission to investigate whether the decision to put Japanese Americans into internment camps had been justified. The commission found that it was not. In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the Civil Liberties Act, which apologized for the internment on behalf of the U.S. government and authorized a payment of $20,000 to each individual camp survivor.

The law admitted that government actions were based on “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership,” and 82,219 Japanese Americans who had been interned and their heirs were paid more than $1.6 billion in reparations.[21]

The Hollywood blacklisting officially ended in 1960, when Dalton Trumbo, a former Communist party member and a one of the Hollywood Ten,[22] was publicly credited as the screenwriter of the highly successful film “Exodus”, and later publicly acknowledged for writing the screenplay for the movie “Spartacus.”

While he was blacklisted, Trumbo wrote under a pseudonym the script for two Academy Awards winning movies, and in 2016, his story was the subject of a movie titled “Trumbo.”

McCarthy’s antics were rejected by the U.S. Senate, which on December 2, 1954 censured[23] him by a vote of 67 to 22. It was one of the rare cases of such extreme form of repudiation[24] by fellow Senators, and it strongly affected McCarthy. He died three years later at the age of 48.Q9

© 2016. The Salem (and other) Witch Hunts by CommonLit is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

  1. Embroil(verb): to become deeply involved in an argument, conflict, or difficult situation
  2. Untoward(adjective): unexpected and inappropriate or inconvenient
  3. Voluble(adjective): speaking or spoken fluently, without interruption
  4. Indemnity(noun): security or protection against a loss or other financial burden
  5. Depose(verb): to remove from office suddenly and forcefully
  6. Assimilate(verb):

    to conform to the customs, attitudes, and habits of a group or nation

  7. Lexicon(noun): the vocabulary of a person, language, or branch of knowledge
  8. Scurrilous(adjective): making or spreading scandalous claims about someone with the intention of damaging their reputation
  9. Reparation(noun): the making of amends for a wrong one has done, by paying money or helping those who have been wronged
  10. Repudiation(noun): rejection of a proposal or idea

One thought on “Salem Witch Trials Essay Ideas For Fahrenheit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *