Vietcong Tactics Essay Contest

If at the height of the Vietnam War (1965-76) you had asked an American who their country was fighting in Vietnam, most would have said the Viet Cong. The Viet Cong was a network of communist agents and subversives, supplied and controlled by North Vietnam but active within South Vietnam. The origins of the Viet Cong begin with the Geneva Accords of 1954. Under the terms of the Accords, military personnel were ordered to return to their place of origin, either North or South Vietnam. Many Viet Minh soldiers and sympathisers, however, stayed in South Vietnam and remained ‘underground’, mostly in rural or remote areas. Their reasons for doing this are in dispute. Some historians suggest that indigenous communist groups in South Vietnam chose to remain there, rather than shift to the North. Others claim they did so under orders from Hanoi, which wanted to disrupt the development of the South and prepare for a future war. Whatever the reasons, by 1959 there were as many as 20 different communist cells scattered around South Vietnam. In total these cells contained as many as 3,000 men.

The formation of an organised communist insurgency in South Vietnam was masterminded by Le Duan. A native of Vietnam’s southern provinces, Le Duan was active in communist groups in the Mekong region in the 1940s. By the mid 1950s he was a high ranking member of the North Vietnamese government, occupying a seat in the Lao Dong Politburo. In 1956 Le Duan developed a plan, the ‘Road to the South’. In it he called for communists to rise up and gather support, overthrow South Vietnam’s leader Ngo Dinh Diem and expel foreign advisors and businessmen. Le Duan presented this plan to members of the Politburo but they did not support his call for a full scale war. The Politburo considered North Vietnam’s domestic policies, such as economic and military reform, to be more pressing. It would be better, they said, to wait three years for attempting to facilitate a revolution in South Vietnam. Nevertheless the Politburo authorised communist insurgents in the South to begin a limited campaign of violence.

This began in mid 1957 with a few units carrying out acts of terrorism against foreigners, foreign sympathisers and government targets. South Vietnamese communists called this campaign of violence the “extermination of traitors”. In 1957 alone there were more than 150 assassinations attributed to communist subversives. In July, 17 people were killed by the Viet Minh underground in Chau Doc. A police chief and his family were murdered in September. The insurgents also carried out bombings of hotels and cafes in Saigon and other cities. Many of these locations were frequented by foreigners and several Americans were injured during these attacks. Newspapers in Saigon began referring to the insurgents as Viet Cong, a shortened form of Viet Nam Cong San (Vietnamese communists). The insurgents continued their violence between 1958 and 1959, while improving their organisation and command structures and obtaining the backing of Moscow.

Under international pressure to rein in this violence, the North Vietnamese government continually stressed that southern communists were acting independently, not under instruction from Hanoi. By mid 1959, however, the North was providing obvious support to the Viet Cong. The revolutionary movement in South Vietnam was formalised on December 20th 1960, with the formation of Mat Tran Dan Toc Giai Phong Mien Nam (the National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam). Westerners came to know it as the National Liberation Front (NLF). Shortly after its formation the NLF issued a ten point program that called on the Vietnamese people to “overthrow the camouflaged colonial regime of the American imperialists and the dictatorial power of Ngo Dinh Diem”. Membership of the NLF grew rapidly, filled both by southern sympathisers and thousands of communists who streamed down from the North. The NLF also adopted its own anthem called Giai Phong Mien Nam (Liberate the South):

“To liberate the South we decided to advance.
To defeat the American Empire and destroy the country-sellers.
Oh bones have broken and blood has fallen, the hatred is rising high.
Our country has been separated for so long.
Here the sacred Cuu Long river.
Here glorious Truong Son Mountains
Are urging us to advance to kill the enemy,
Arm by arm under a common flag.”

By 1961 the NLF’s internal organisation had evolved further and resembled the structure of the Lao Dong. Major decisions were made by a Presidium (in effect, a mini Politburo) and implemented by a Secretariat. On the ground the NLF adopted its own “shadow government”, which operated across 20 regions and was commanded by a party official. Within each region there were several districts and villages, overseen by one or more NLF cadres. The role of these cadres went beyond military and guerrilla operations. The NLF was also a political movement tha worked to attract and build popular support. NLF teachings stressed two important concepts: dan tranh (‘struggle’) and giai phong (‘liberation’). Its cadres circulated these ideas by organising political education forums, youth groups and women’s groups. The NLF also disseminated information and propaganda that praised communist ideas and values, as well as communist land reforms in the North. Cadres also informed people about the crimes and exploitations of South Vietnamese leader Ngo Dinh Diem and his followers.

The NLF’s military arm was called the Quan Doi Giai Phong (Liberation Army). South Vietnamese and Westerners knew it as the Viet Cong. Its members were given extensive political and historical training, including sessions about the failure of the Geneva Accords, American double standards and the excesses of the Diem regime. For obvious reasons, most NLF operations could not be conducted in the open. In most parts of South Vietnam the NLF remained an underground organisation; its movements and activities were often described as “ghostly”. There was no NLF uniform or insignia, so most Viet Cong were indistinguishable from ordinary South Vietnamese. There was also no official NLF headquarters or even a particular area where NLF officials could be found. Presidium members held their meetings in remote locations, rarely meeting in the same place twice. Their decisions were passed along the chain of command either by word of mouth or on scrawled notes written in code.

Thousands of South Vietnamese, marginalised and dispossessed by the corruption and brutality of the Diem regime, enlisted to fight with the NLF. Those unable to fight – including women, children and the elderly – gave support in other ways, promising to provide food, safety and information about enemy troop movements. Buddhist monks, former members of religious sects like the Cao Dai and Hoa Hao, displaced peasants and urban workers could be found in NLF ranks. Support did not only flow one way, however. The NLF’s bombings, sabotage and assassinations also generated considerable opposition. These attacks, though aimed at foreign or South Vietnamese government targets, often killed innocent civilians, destroyed private property and disrupted business. As a consequence there were many South Vietnamese who supported neither the Diem government or the NLF.

By 1960, the NLF had grown and evolved into a sophisticated communist insurgency. With the approval of Hanoi, the NLF increased its terrorist activities in the South. In October 1961 there were 150 NLF bombings and attacks, triple the number of the previous month. This escalation prompted US president John F. Kennedy to increase the number of American military advisors in South Vietnam, with several thousand arriving over the next six months. One of the most successful Viet Cong operations occurred in January 1963 when around 1,500 South Vietnamese (ARVN) soldiers, along with American advisors, tracked down 300 Viet Cong near Ap Bac in the Mekong delta. As the ARVN soldiers approached the enemy across rice fields, the Viet Cong were able to inflict heavy casualties from concealed positions. The ARVN had the advantage of American helicopters, however even these proved ineffective at locating and eliminating the enemy. Around 200 ARVN troops were shot, almost half of them fatally, while three US advisors were also killed. In contrast the Viet Cong lost only 18 men. The tactics they employed at Ap Bac – stealth, concealment, patience, discipline and teamwork – had withstood the most modern weaponry in Vietnam. It was not the last time these tactics would prove successful.

After the American military escalation in 1965, eradication of the Viet Cong became the number one objective for the US military. The Viet Cong were both featured and demonised in the American press. They were painted as communist revolutionaries and heartless terrorists, responsible for every act of carnage in South Vietnam. American military personnel serving in Vietnam knew them as “VC”, “Victor Charlie”, “Charlie” or “Chuck”. The attitude of most American soldiers towards the Viet Cong evolved into a combination of hatred, fear and begrudging admiration. The Viet Cong were cursed and condemned for not following the Western conventions of war. They were labelled cowards for refusing to fight in open battle. Instead, the Viet Cong relied on elements of speed and surprise. Ambushes, lightning raids, sniping, tunnel warfare, land minds and booby traps became their preferred tactic. Viet Cong soldiers were subversive, evasive and crafty, hiding among civilian populations, taking shelter in thick jungle, moving only in the dead of night. As the Vietnam War unfolded, the world’s strongest military power found itself at war with an enemy that could scarcely be found.

1. The Viet Cong was the military arm of the National Liberation Front (NLF), an underground communist insurgency formed in December 1960 and active in South Vietnam.
2. The seeds of the NLF were several thousand communists who defied the terms of the Geneva Accord (1954) and remained underground in South Vietnam.
3. As support for the NLF grew it adopted organisation and command structures similar to those of the Lao Dong, as well its own a military arm, the Viet Cong.
4. The NLF and Viet Cong were shadowy organisations that blended into rural life but remained politically and militarily active, recruiting and disseminating propaganda.
5. Viet Cong bombings and operations increased from late 1961. Using guerrilla methods they targeted foreign and government personnel, buildings and facilities.

© Alpha History 2016. Content on this page may not be republished or distributed without permission. For more information please refer to our Terms of Use.
This page was written by Jennifer Llewellyn, Jim Southey and Steve Thompson. To reference this page, use the following citation:
J. Llewellyn et al, “The Viet Cong”, Alpha History, accessed [today’s date],

Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong in Vietnamin

  • Length: 976 words (2.8 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong in Vietnamin

During the Vietnam War there were two main sides (other countries were
involved, giving financial support etc). There was the ARVN (Army of
the republic of Vietnam) and the U.S. who were capitalist. Against the
NVA (The North Vietnam Army) and the Vietcong (people based in South
Vietnamwho supported the NVA). Both sides used different military
tactics during the war.

At the start of the war both sides used a similar tactic: to gain the
trust of the South Vietnamese people and convince them to support
their own side. The Vietcong used infiltration; they spread the idea
of revolution and at the same time signed up new recruits. The
Vietcong were more appealing to the peasants as they spoke the same
language and offered free land by doing this they gained control of
the countryside in south Vietnam.

The US used a similar idea called 'Pacification'. They said this was
to 'win the hearts and minds' of the people of S.Vietnam. It was a
policy where they provided schools and clinics and built houses,
roads, canals and bridges. This was to gain their trust because they
were afraid of scaring the people while they were attacking the
Vietcong in the countryside. This however did not succeed as the US
lost their trust when they started bombing and the amount of violence
caused by the US increased. The scheme was abandoned when money and
soldiers were needed to fight the Vietcong.

The Vietcong did not have the modern equipment and weaponry that the
US had. But they had a huge advantage over the US; they knew the
jungle and countryside they were also well suited to it. They could
easily hide amongst the trees from the US trees and aircraft. It was
easy because of their well developed Ho Chi Minh trail (the hidden
network of paths used by the Vietcong). The Vietcong used Guerrilla
tactics; they would use their knowledge of the jungle to their
advantage and would go around in small group's surprising and

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong in Vietnamin." 10 Mar 2018

LengthColor Rating 
Essay on Why The United States Withdrew Its Forces From Vietnamin 1973 - Why The United States Withdrew Its Forces From Vietnamin 1973 The impact of the Vietnam War upon the USAwas as great as the attack upon the Twin Towers in 2001.Previously the USAwas reluctant to fight aboard as in World Wars One and Two but in Vietnam it had fully committed itself to fight abroad with its own troops. It was to avoid such involvements again until 2001. There are various reasons why the USA withdrew its forces such as changes in public opinion, the tactics of the different armies and a change in US foreign policy....   [tags: Papers]1287 words
(3.7 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong Essay - Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong The USA was a richer 1st world country than Vietnam, meaning it was better equipped for a military attacks. It had: more and better weapons; better access to well trained soldiers; a good military understanding; good transportation and was generally better equipped for traditional styles of warfare. Vietnam was a 3rd world country. It had: limited access to weapons; few funds to train soldiers and a poorer military understanding....   [tags: Papers]982 words
(2.8 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Military Tactics Used by the USA and the Vietcong in the 1960s Essay - Military Tactics Used by the USA and the Vietcong in the 1960s As war progressed the military tactics became increasingly important. Both sides first tactic was to try and win the hearts and minds of the people. Most Vietcong had strong relationships with the peasants who they helped, working in the fields in return for shelter. The Americans tried to win the people by providing aid but they couldn’t tell the peasants from the Vietcong and any good work they did was cancelled out by their association with the hated Diem....   [tags: Papers]375 words
(1.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Why the USA Become Involved in Vietnamin the 1950s and 1960s - Why the USA Become Involved in Vietnamin the 1950s and 1960s In the 19th century France owned a huge part of South East Asia. This area was known as Indo- China. During the Second World War, Japanese troops occupied this area. Local people did not want to be ruled by foreigners so they organised resistance groups. One of them was the Viet Minh. It was mainly a communist group, led by Ho Chi Minh. Japan surrendered on August 15th 1945. Soon after that Ho Chi Minh announced that Vietnam was an independent republic....   [tags: Papers]912 words
(2.6 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Influence Tactics Essay - Rational persuasion has been found to be used in all three directions: upwards, downwards and laterally. (Yukl, & Falbe, 1990) Rational persuasion is used in all directions in organizations because it is relevant in most discussions. Another contingency affecting the use of rational persuasion is the objective of the influence attempt. (Yukl, Guinan, & Sottolano, 1995) Rational persuasion has been shown to be used most often to procure political support, resources, or approvals. Rational persuasion has been shown to be flexible and adaptable for the vast majority of situations involving influence....   [tags: Rational Persuasion, Pressure Tactics]1896 words
(5.4 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
The Suffragist Movement in the USA Essays - The suffragist movement took place in the United States in the early nineteenth century and it was one of the major social change in American history. Women fought for their rights and believed suffrage was the most effective to change an unjust system. Iron Jawed Angels was a film that covered a chapter in U.S. history of the struggles of women who fought for their rights to vote. In a country controlled by sexism, it was difficult for the women to fight against the men. The women used many tactics to gain equal rights as men....   [tags: Suffrage, USA, feminism, history, ]677 words
(1.9 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Persuasion Tactics Used in Negotiation Essay - Introduction Hours after watching a vision of Saddam Hussain captured by the US forces, Moammar Gadhafi contacted the US government and pledged to cease its nuclear weapons development in exchange for immunity (USA Today 2011). Amidst the worsening economic turmoil in Europe, IMF chief Christine Lagarde travelled to Beijing to seek financial support from China (Barriaux 2011). Days after the Qantas negotiation dispute ended, Qantas management took out advertisements in newspapers across Australia persuading affected customers to fly with the airline company again (Barlass 2011)....   [tags: Government]
:: 20 Works Cited
2034 words
(5.8 pages)
Term Papers[preview]
Essay on Negotiation Tactics - The paper focuses on the strategies and tactics used during negotiations. The paper specifically addresses the use of hard bargaining techniques of negotiation. The paper includes examples of some of the hard bargaining tactics that are used by some of the biggest Internet giants such as Apple, Facebook, and Twitter. The paper also addresses negotiation tactic as illustrated in the International Bestseller, Getting to Yes, Negotiating Agreement without Giving In by Roger Fisher and William Ury as well as Bruce Patton from the Harvard Negotiation Project....   [tags: Business Management ]
:: 6 Works Cited
1744 words
(5 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Essay on Immigration to USA - When I was in fourth grade a Jewish man visited my school to talk about his experiences during the Holocaust. However, his account of his time spent in the consecration camps was not what made my eyes to tear up that day. He related that when he was a young boy, he and his friends thought that in America money grew on trees. He said that growing up in Czechoslovakia he always dreamed of coming to America and living the "American dream." I could see the tears well up in his eyes and could hear the tremble in his voice when he began to tell us how lucky we were to be born in the USA because it "is the best country in the world." This was the first time when I realized how enormously blessed I...   [tags: Immigrants Immigration USA]943 words
(2.7 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
The Foreign Policy of the USA Essay - The Foreign Policy of the USA Americans viewed themselves as geographically isolated and this made them believe they could withdraw from the rest of the world and focus on their own affairs, notably after the great depression. It meant that the USA avoided being involved in foreign disputes that may lead to war. Americans believed the Pacific and Atlantic oceans protected them. b.) Describe how the US contributed to winning the Second World War. [4] The USA agreed for Britain to receive American armaments immediately but delay a payment after an appeal by Churchill in 1941....   [tags: Papers]964 words
(2.8 pages)
Better Essays[preview]

attacking American soldiers with grenades and booby traps. The
Vietcong would never come out in the open so it was difficult for the
US soldiers to fight back or defend themselves.

I mentioned earlier the during Guerrilla warfare the Vietcong would
build booby traps to kill Americans. They used a lot of trip wires;
they would either attach a trip wire to a grenade and when a soldier
tripped on a wire the grenade would explode, killing him and soldiers
nearby. Or they would use a tin can trap where they would take the pin
out of the grenade and put the grenade inside a can then when the
soldier tripped on the wire, the sudden jolt would set the grenade
off. They also used a lot of other types of booby traps, they used a
Bouncing Betty trap, a fuel tank trap, a punji trap and they would
bury mines.

These sorts of techniques irritated the US greatly because they could
not avoid the booby traps and were loosing vast amounts of soldiers to
these sorts of traps. It was also difficult for the US soldiers to be
transported in other ways, other then helicopters but even then they
couldn't land in dense areas of the forest. This was quite a problem
for the US they started the policy of Attrition, where they would wear
the Vietcong down. In 1964 they started selective bombing where they
would bomb places like bridges, railways and supply dumps etc. this
made it difficult for the enemy to fight. But this was awkward as it
was difficult for the helicopters to aim. It was yet again another
failure of the US; the Vietcong were succeeding in most areas of the

In 1965 Conventional warfare began. The NVA (North Vietnamese army)
became more heavily involved because they had received financial
support from China so were able buy more machinery. They started
fighting the US out in the open with high tech weaponry and tanks.

The US realised that the war wasn't going well for them so they
invented a new technique; Search and destroy missions. Because the
Vietcong had succeeded in Infiltration and were now hidden amongst the
South Vietnamese people it was difficult for the US soldiers to detect
them. In Search and destroy missions they would hunt down and kill any
Vietcong members. They would look for any signs of the Vietcong
(excess food, hidden supplies and weapons or Vietcong documents). They
would destroy all evidence and kill any suspected Vietcong members.
They would often be wrong and wipe out whole villages when the
suspects were innocent. The soldiers were angry with what the Vietcong
were doing to their colleagues and kill people just because they
wanted to take their anger out on someone. One example of this was the
Mai Lai massacre, 1968. This was where a village was attacked and
there were "piles of innocent bodies were strewn across the path".

The Vietcong continued to use Guerrilla tactics to kill the US
soldiers and were becoming more and more successful. But the US
weren't prepared to surrender yet; they came up with a new idea: to
use chemicals to wipe out the forest and Vietcong at the same time.
Because there would be no trees the environment would be less humid,
so it would be easier to work in. By doing this the US hoped to expose
the Vietcong Ho Chi Minh trail. Also they would be able to move around
a lot more easily because they would be able to use their tanks. To do
this they would use Agent Orange and Napalm. Agent Orange is a
powerful weed killer that stripped away leaves and undergrowth. Napalm
is jellied petrol that sticks to everything it comes into contact with
and explodes on impact. They also used giant bombs to splinter all the
trees in the forest into pieces. But this failed like many of their
other tactics because the jungle was massive and they could never
destroy all off it. The Vietcong simply moved to other parts.

The war had now intensified and selective bombing had failed but in
1966 they increased the level of bombing and started 'saturation
bombing' where they would bomb everything in sight. To do this they
used B-52 bombers which flew at 50,000 feet and couldn't be seen or
hears from the ground. They did this to try and get North Vietnamto
negotiate with the USA as they were desperate to win the war and end
all the suffering.

In 1968 both sides wanted the war to end as it had been going on for a
long time and neither side could see the war ending. So the Vietcong
took a step forward: they launched a massive surprise attack on the
US. It was to be a surprise as the US had expected North Vietnam to be
celebrating the annual Tet festival, but they weren't. Also the US
didn't think that the Vietcong had so much equipment. They did because
they had joined with the NVA to attack over 100 targets. The Vietcong
had never fourth in the open before so for them it was a big strategy
change. The attack was named the Tet offensive.

It was not a complete success for the Vietcong as over 30,000 people
died in the attack; this meant that the NVA had to take over the
majority of the fighting in S. Vietnam. To the Americans it was a
great shock as they thought that they were winning. As a result they
increased the mount of saturation bombing and Search and Destroy
missions. The NVA were not used to fighting in S. Vietnam but the
Americans were experience so USA were hopeful but at the same
desperate to win the war and for it al to be over.

One thought on “Vietcong Tactics Essay Contest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *